That line, Ladies and Gentlemen, was from the opening remarks of candidate Amy Dawson at a judicial candidate forum last Friday (October 24th) in south Minneapolis. And it was followed up with, as best I can recollect, “…and I’ll probably have to recuse myself from some cases if I’m elected.”

Now, I’m not an attorney, but even the ol’ TwoPutter knows a no-no when he hears one. The election of judges, and Amy Dawson is a candidate for the Hennepin County Bench Seat 61, is supposed to be about judicial philosophy, NOT political ideology. That comment, “I love to sue insurance companies” goes straight to judicial philosophy: it’s ok to have blatant biases and sit on a seat where citizens should be able to expect judgess with open minds and impartial attitudes.

After the forum was over, I went to the nearest attorney I could find and said: “I cannot believe I just heard a candidate just say she loved to sue insurance companies and would probably have to recuse cases if elected.” “Yeah, it’s like 70 percent of the civil cases filed that involve insurance companies.” I asked Ms. Dawson’s staffer/volunteer about the comment; the reply was “So? She’s said it before.”

Apparently, Ms. Dawson doesn’t see a problem with being blatant about a bias towards an industry that makes up a big percentage of cases she’s likely to hear, should she be elected. I wondered if others did.

First call? My insurance agent. “Say, what would you think about a new judge being elected that says she loves to sue you?” After relaying the particulars, it’s pretty safe that conversation was passed up and on.

I made many calls to mostly attorneys; attorneys on both sides of the political aisle. Only one explained that he wished candidates for the bench were more forthcoming on what their biases are. The rest? Responses ran from “problematic” “unfortunate” “troublesome” to “You’ve got to be (bad word, deleted)in’ (bad word, deleted)in’ me!!!”

No, gentle readers, I am not. One follow up email read: “No credible judicial candidate would ever boast about loving to sue insurance companies and that they would need to recuse themselves from cases. Any candidate making such a statement would face serious questions about whether they had the judicial temperament to serve on the bench.” Another sent this: “Look at Rule 4.1 (11). Her comments may not have been “pledges, promises, or commitments” but they’re close. Admitting she would have to recuse herself over them is an admission of that. Her website is a wink and a nod about judicial independence.”

Almost universal was agreement that if elected, Ms. Dawson would indeed be recusing herself from cases involving insurance companies; one speculated that were Ms. Dawson not to, any insurance company would surely file a motion to recuse immediately upon finding their case had been assigned to Ms. Dawson.

I can assure you, Ladies and Gents, that if I were to find myself in Hennepin County Court, should she win her election Ms Dawson would not be hearing my case – a motion to recuse would be filed. You see, I prefer my judges fair and impartial. Hennepin County deserves a judge ready and able to sit on 100% of the civil cases brought before the bench. Ms. Dawson cannot be that judge with her “I love to sue insurance companies” comment.

***
Photo, above, by TPT at Turtle Bread in south Minneapolis, 24 October 2014

Tagged with:
 

Why Sheila Kihne Lost, In A Nutshell

On August 13, 2014, in Candidates, Videos, by tommy

Last night was Primary Night in Minnesota, and far-right extremist Sheila Kihne lost her challenge to unseat an incumbent Republican State Representative. Ms. Kihne more than just derailed her Tea Party Express candidacy; she got trounced by 20 points. Yes, TWENTY POINTS.

In a last minute surprise for the B side of the Mn Senate District 48 Republican Convention, Kihne announced her challenge to incumbent State Rep Jenifer Loon on convention day last March. Kihne led in each and every round of endorsement balloting. After the fifth and final round, Kihne led 54% to 40% but did not reach the 60% threshold for endorsement.

That such a deeply flawed candidate could not only deny endorsement but almost win it herself at that Convention only shows how far right the Republican activists in Eden Prairie are. Much has been written on Kihne’s flaws. There’s no point in rehashing them here, or going into new ones that would have been brought up had won Kihne won. Sheila, as they say in the political world, is an opposition researcher’s dream come true.

However, one that didn’t come up is worth noting. It’s a YouTube posted under the “Sheila Kihne For State Rep” account and perhaps most clearly demonstrates her greatest flaw. You can watch the whole thing if you want to but what’s important is right there in her opening words.

(direct link to YouTube here)

“Madam Mayor, you said we were to stick to design, but the fact is this is a municipal consent hearing.”

Yep – Sheila starts out by stating she knows she’s out of order. Does knowing she’s out of order stop Kihne from tilting at her windmill du jour? Of course not. At a hearing to discuss design, Sheila wants to fight battles already lost. She knew the battle was lost; she even predicted the count on the soon to be held vote: 4 aye and 1 nay. She said her piece anyway and she’s so proud of being out of order that she posts it on YouTube.

That’s the Sheila that Eden Prairie has come to know and voted against in the Primary held last night. I’d venture to guess the only reason Sheila wasn’t ruled out of order when she started out by saying she was out of order is no one really wanted to hear the tantrum she’d surely throw if she was ruled out of order even though she already knew she was. Better to listen to a minor rant now than give her a cause for a bigger rant later (“they tried to SHUT ME UP – BUT I WON’T BE!”) is my best guess on why Sheila was allowed to continue.

When it comes to Sheila it’s all about Sheila and the windmills she wants to tilt – order be damned. That’s the way Sheila is, the way Sheila is came out during the campaign, the way Sheila is is the reason Sheila lost.

(Screenshot, above: Kihne’s Youtube, captured 13 August 2014)

Tagged with:
 

(Updated – 07 August 2014; see below)

Former U.S. Representative Steve LaTourette served 18 years (1995-2013) in Congress as a center-right Republican from Ohio. Yesterday, he had an op/ed in Politico, entitled “The Grifting Wing vs. The Governing Wing”. In it, LaTourette describes the internal civil war facing the GOP, as a party today. Consider two grafs from it:

“The grifting wing of the party promises that you can have ideological purity—that you don’t have to compromise—and, of course, all you have to do is send them money to make it happen. The governing wing of the Republican Party knows that’s a damn lie. Our Founding Fathers set up a system of government that by its very nature excludes the possibility of one party or one ideological wing of one party getting everything it wants. Ted Cruz, who quotes the founders almost every chance he gets, ought to know this.

Even Ronald Reagan—who won in two of the biggest landslides in American history—was forced to compromise. It was President Reagan who cut deals with Democrats to extend the solvency of Social Security and put the federal budget on a sounder footing. It was Reagan who famously said that someone who votes with him 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally. Reagan’s record and rhetoric stands in marked contrast to the grifting win of the party today, even as the grifters invoke his memory in their disingenuous appeals.

That op/ed by LaTourette is exactly what’s happening in next Tuesday’s (12 Aug 14) GOP Primary for State House District 48B. Let’s take a closer look at that graphic, above, which is a screenshot from of Sheila Kihne’s blog (with “Reagan” entered into the search field):

Invoke Reagan? Invoke “Founding Fathers”? Kihne does it all the time, just like LaTourette spoke of, in this op/ed linked above. Ms. Kihne is challenging State Representative Jenifer Loon in the primary because, essentially, Kihne feels Loon isn’t conservative enough. So much for Reagan’s “80% and you’re my friend” for Ms. Kihne…

Ms. Kihne appears to be a political opportunist – a grifter, if you will – of the worst sort. Ms. Kihne’s main attack on Rep. Loon is a vote to legalize same-sex marriage in Minnesota; a vote Rep. Loon describes in a recent Minnesota Public Radio (“MPR”) story thusly:

“(Rep. Loon) said she voted for same-sex marriage after talking it over with constituents, noting that a majority in her district voted against the proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in 2012.

She didn’t regret the vote but added, “It was tough. I never had to make such a tough decision in the Legislature. I just think if people can understand the process, understand how much I wrestled with it, trying to be true to my own beliefs, to being true to what I felt my constituency was telling me. I did the best I could with a tough issue.”

In the same story Kihne is now on record for not – let me repeat that, “not” – supporting repeal of the marriage law. In short, Kihne is so upset about that vote – “the straw that broke the camel’s back” – she’s running for election but, if elected, she won’t do a thing about it: “Kihne says she won’t push to repeal the same-sex marriage law if elected” Kihne is running away from the reason she’s running – marriage restrictions.

But Kihne was more than happy to take the money from those that, one could easily assume, want to do exactly that.

If that isn’t opportunism, what is?

After you peel back Sheila Kihne’s facade of fiscal conservative views, she’s got one issue – making her yet again a “single issue candidate.” Michael Brodkorb summed up what Kihne’s challenge, Kihne’s “issue,” is really all about: “It’s all about Sheila”. From it:

“Loon is just the unfortunate person standing in the way of Kihne’s insatiable ego. The only mistake Loon made was living in the same district as Kihne. The analysis of this race isn’t complicated; this is about Kihne wanting to have a larger platform to promote her views, push her agenda and have the world function the way Kihne believes it should.”

.

It’s all about Sheila selling Sheila, and then Sheila running from what she ran for. That’s her track record. Case in point – Sheila’s now running from what she’s written, calling what she’s written, like the post where she trashed military veterans, “facetious.” Sheila will tell you that keeping your word is important. Apparently, not so much with hers. Around the district I hear: “Is there anyone Sheila hasn’t turned on?”

Next Tuesday’s House District 48B Primary is a case in point for Republican Steve Tourette’s op/ed, “The Grifting Wing vs. The Governing Wing”.

* * *
UPDATE – 07 August 2014
The Star Tribune newspaper published its endorsement today: “Endorsement: Loon over Kihne in GOP state House primary”. In it they note Kihne “declined to meet with a Star Tribune Editorial Board screening panel before the primary.” Bottom line? Rather than answer tough questions on policy and potentially tougher questions on her past writings, she chose to run away – she “declined” to articulate and defend her positions and writings.

This should not come as a surprise. Earlier this year (June 11th, 2014 to be exact) she announced on her “Sheila Kihne for House 48B Eden Prairie” that she wouldn’t be answering questions from the Chamber of Commerce: “I respectfully decline completing the questionnaire.”

Compare/contrast with Rep. Jenifer Loon, who, as far as I know, will talk to anyone. Undoubtedly, Ms. Kihne will defend her choices to run away from questions from the Strib and Chamber. These decisions are not the actions a confident candidate would make, but it does make Ms. Kihne, especially when combined with the original post, a candidate clearly earning the dubious distinction as “The Running Away Woman.”
* * *

Tagged with:
 

Last Thursday, July 27th, I appeared as a guest on Democratic Visions, a cable access show available in Eden Prairie, Edina, Bloomington, Richfield, Minneapolis, Minnetonka and Hopkins.

We talked about Veterans issues from the national level down to a special dishonorable mention of GOP Candidate for State Representative Sheila Kihne, for what she put on her blog — a post entitled “IAVA, VFW PAC, Liberal, Soros, Shadow Organizations, Left-Wings Lunatics, Infiltrate the Military”.

The entire show will be broadcast on the following schedule:

Hopkins, Minnetonka, Edina, Richfield and Eden Prairie – Comcast Channel 15 – Sundays at 9 p.m., Mondays at 10:00 p.m. and Wednesdays at 5:30 p.m.

Bloomington – BCAT Cable Channel 16 – Tuesdays at 2:00 p.m. & 10:00 p.m.; Fridays at 9:30 p.m.; Saturdays at 7:30 a.m. & 2:30 p.m.

Minneapolis – MTN Channel 16 – Sundays at 8:30 p.m., Mondays 3:30 a.m., 9:30 a.m., 2:30 p.m.

Here’s the sneak preview of the segment I’m in – enjoy!

Tagged with:
 

UPDATE — This morning I noticed Lieutenant General Robert Gard, whom Sheila trashed on her blog, was published in Defense One; The Good General’s article is entitled “The One Thing The U.S. Can’t Train The Iraqi Army To Do”. It’s a good read – much better than the divisive tripe Sheila wrote, and it’s an excellent example of why reasonable people don’t need unreasonable people like Sheila Kihne in government. — TPT, 15 July 2014

Sheila Kihne, Republican Candidate for State Representative (HD48B), had a blog. Two of them, actually. One is still up, it’s called “The Activist Next Door”. The other, picking up where the first left off, is not. Which makes sense; Sheila is mounting a primary challenge on August 12th on the basis of her incumbent’s “record” – and it’s always convenient for a challenger when the incumbent has a record but the challenger does not. A record, like, say, that cute little picture, to the right that adorned Sheila’s blog – “No Liberals Allowed” – which pretty much sums up Sheila.

Except, Sheila DOES have a record – it’s her record of her thoughts that she put into words on her blogs. And through the wonderful technology of The WayBack Machine, all those posts never really went away.

Some of Kihne’s writings are simply bizarre; such as the one where she seems to advocate a voting Poll Tax on poor people, or her “welfare to work” treatise, “My Redistribution Plan”. My personal favorite, from Sheila’s “plan”? Number 5:

5. you will not own any of the following items (if you do, you’ll immediately sell them) an iPod, a flat screen television, video games, a computer or any designer clothing

After all, everyone knows it’s super easy to prepare resumes and find a new and/or better job without a computer, yes?

As bizarre as those ones are, this blogpost jumped out:

Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America and the Progressive Plan for the U.S. Military

This story came to me from a great reader of this blog and I’m happy to post it here. We all know the left has infiltrated and taken over many of our institutions, but did you know the U.S. Military is their next target? (emphasis added)

Ummmm…. “…the left has infiltrated…” — that one, Ladies and Gentlemen, sure reminds me of Joe McCarthy and his claim that their are “known communists” in the State Department.

Sheila’s post goes on to trash the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America organization and it’s founder, Paul Rieckhoff. Well, and question, essentially, the patriotism of Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez (USA, Ret.), Brigadier General Stephen N. Xenakis, MD (USA, Ret.), Lieutenant General Robert G. Gard, Jr. (USA, Ret.), and Major General Paul D. Eaton (USA, Ret.). Oh – and a full-bird, too: Colonel James D. McDonough, Jr. (USA, Ret.).

It seems that unlike Joe McCarthy, Ms. Kihne is more than happy to name names of those evil lefties that have “infiltrated” government.

And, of course, there’s a follow up blog post:

IAVA, VFW PAC, Liberal, Soros, Shadow Organizations, Left-Wings Lunatics, Infiltrate the Military

In honor of the left’s temporary victory with Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, I thought it was time to talk military.

The purpose of my headline is to help folks looking for more information on the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) a Soros-funded organization that PRETENDS to be non-partisan but is quite the opposite. So rather than hide my agenda like some people, I figured I’d make it easy for them. This site includes a nice little summary of the the IAVA (Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans.) The original piece has received thousands of hits, so I know that people are starting to smell a rat. And now, it seems that Rikki Tikki Tavi has found himself a little friend. But we’ll get to that later.

Ladies and Gentlemen, you can get to that now, through the links above, or go later, and read those whole posts yourself. Or not. It’s really up to you – but the words on Sheila’s blog are the words she owns.

Not that Paul Rieckhoff needs any defending from the likes of Sheila Kihne, I will say this: I met Paul years ago, I know Paul, but I don’t know – nor care – what political party Paul leans to, or belongs to, or if he has any party affiliation at all. Because it doesn’t matter; what DOES matter and what I do know is Paul is a tireless advocate for Veterans and it’s abhorrent that Sheila Kihne would see fit to trash him, his work, his organization, and his organization’s work.

Well, and trash 4 Generals and a Colonel too.

There’s one area where everyone – EVERYONE – is supposed to check their politics at the door: it’s the issue of Veterans and taking care of those that served. These days, in St. Paul, in the Legislature, that’s the way it is, as I wrote here: “One highlight is the sincere care about and for veterans by Members in both parties. It’s refreshing that veterans issues don’t have the political biases too many other issues do.” In Minnesota’s Legislature, there are outstanding leaders in the State House and State Senate in both the Republican and Democratic parties who put Veterans first and politics second.

Ms. Kihne, candidate for the State House, as evidenced by the written words on her blogs, clearly doesn’t believe that.

Let’s take another look at that graphic that once adorned Ms. Kihne’s blog:

Somewhere, I would guess, the ghost of Joe McCarty is smiling.

Tagged with:
 

This great country’s founders feared and loathed corporations; the Boston Tea Party was a revolt against that era’s largest international corporation, the British East India Company. Of the hundreds that participated or watched tea being dumped from three British ships, only one (Francis Akeley) was arrested – and released due to lack of evidence. Clearly, our Founders had no love for the East India Company. There’s no mention of corporations in the Constitution; “We the people” is.

Yesterday’s Supreme Court decision expanding “personhood” of corporations is leading us down a path we really don’t want to go. Where might that be? “Nations are bankrupt, gone. Corporate society was an inevitable destiny.” Pay close attention to the question at the 2:00 minute mark….

(Direct link to YouTube here)

 

..and so unapologetic.

When you watch those that want to go back and bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iraq, remember this: they were wrong about everything they predicted, AND they created The Mother Of All FUBAR’s. There were no WMD’s. We weren’t greeted with candy and flowers. It wasn’t over in 6 weeks nor 6 months. It wasn’t paid for by Iraqi oil revenue. Major combat operations didn’t end, yada yada yada.

“Mission Accomplished”??!? Only in their minds; here on terra firma, not so much.

But don’t expect them to own up nor take any responsibility for what they did/what they said. This is typical of what they were saying/doing then; they’re still saying/doing that now.

(direct link to YouTube)

 

On June 4th there was a groundbreaking ceremony for the Minnesota Military Family Tribute (read=”memorial”) at the Minnesota State Capitol. And it was a nice occasion; speakers included Gold Star parents Ken and Julie Drevnick, Major General (Ret) Harry Sieben, Congressman Erik Paulsen and Governor Mark Dayton. All spoke of the sacrifices military service has on the home front. “When a soldier is deployed, an entire family is deployed. The mother is sitting home watching the news like she’s never watched it before, wondering if her son or daughter is there.” remarked Major General (Ret) and now Mn Dept of Veterans Affairs Commissioner Larry Shellito.

Indeed Mothers do – as do spouses, fathers, brothers, sisters, in-laws, friends and neighbors. Lest anyone forget: war is hell on the home front, too.

To me, there was a disconnect at this event. While this memorial honoring the sacrifices of families is nice and well deserved (and paid for by private donations), there was legislation introduced and debated this last legislative session that would have severely and adversely affected spouses and widows of those that served. It’s a zombie bill; it was stopped last session but was not killed. It’s sure to be brought up again and Again and AGAIN. While memorials are nice, honoring the sacrifices requires more than that.

Ever since the Minneapolis Veterans Home was built (late 1880′s, shortly after the end of the Civil War), spouses and widows have been eligible to receive care there as long as they had the medical necessity and the financial need. After all, President Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address called for care of the Veteran, the spouse, the widow, the orphan. For over 125 years, the great State of Minnesota has honored that call.

Earlier this year, legislation was introduced in the Minnesota Legislature that would take away a benefit available to spouses and widows. To be clear: Veterans and Veterans Organizations (American Legion, VFW, Disabled American Veterans, etc) did not ask for this. Actually, every major Veterans Organization opposes this change, for a very simple reason: spouses and widows of veterans made sacrifices, too. That button, above? “Support Military Spouses – they don’t wear the uniform but they share the burdens”

It would be a real shame if this legislation was passed next spring, right before the Minnesota Military Family Tribute (“memorial”) is dedicated in June 2015.

(direct link to YouTube)

 

Had To Write It….

On June 5, 2014, in Veterans, by tommy

… before the session ended. And that’s OK; the VFW State Convention starts today and it’ll be interesting to hear what’s reported up there before I report what happened (or, didn’t) during the 2014 legislative session in St. Paul. So, the Legislative recap will be in July’s newsletter. Here’s what went out to Post and Auxiliary Membership for June:

* * *
As of this writing, the Minnesota Legislature is still in session and several issues affecting Veterans have not been resolved. What we do know so far is that the priority ranking of Veterans and Spouses/Widows for entry into Minnesota’s five Veterans Homes will not be considered this year. The House Veterans Committee Chair, Mary Murphy, indicated there will continue to be conversations on this when the new Legislature convenes next January, so it is very important as we head into election season to tell your Representatives – and, their challengers – that the VFW as an organization opposes these changes to admittance into our Veterans Homes. The VFW worked hard to stop these changes – one reason being that war is hell on the home front, too – and apparently, our work is not done.

To find contact information for your State Representative and State Senator, >http://www.leg.state.mn.us/leg/districtfinder.aspx.

We are also tracking how much money is appropriated for our Veterans Homes for maintenance and asset preservation. Governor Dayton recommended the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs (MDVA) receive a little over $4 million from bonding this year. It looks like the House and Senate may not agree – and may actually use some of the money to build Veterans Memorials in North St. Paul and Edina instead of taking care of Veterans facilities. While the VFW is appreciative of building Veterans memorials, we do not feel that they should be at the expense of delivering services to Veterans.

While the VFW would prefer – it’s actually a legislative goal – to eliminate the state income tax on military retirement pay, the Legislature is looking at increasing the tax credit amount from $750 to $1,500 for individuals who separated from military service before the end of the year and served at least 20 years in the military, had a service-connected disability rating of 100 percent total and permanent, or were honorably discharged and receive a pension or other retirement pay for service in the military. While it’s not what we want, it is better than nothing and for that we are appreciative.

Another legislative accomplishment is passage of HF2365. Professional licensing boards will be required to expedite license processing for former and current members of the military. This passed the House on a vote of 123-0, and will make it easier for Veterans to use their military skills to gain similar employment as civilians.

A full legislative recap will be included in our next newsletter. As we welcome John Suckerman as our Post’s new Quartermaster, I will continue to cover legislation as our Post’s – and also VFW 7th District’s – Legislative Officer.
* * *

 

“…the ol’ TwoPutter gets some ink…”

Your Capitol Hill Update
By Rich Zierdt, State Legislative Chairman
Gopher Oversea’r; > Volume 68, No. 1 Feb – May 2014

Special Note From Washington, D.C.

On March 2, 2014, our State Commander Frank Presfield led a delegation of senior state officers, including the state President of our Ladies Auxiliary, to Washington D.C. to attend our National VFW Legislative Conference. After many meetings with the National Legislative office where we were briefed in depth on the issues and priorities for this event, we spent Tuesday and Wednesday on Capitol Hill meeting with our members of Congress. Senator Klobuchar was still having trouble returning to the Capitol due to inclement weather and no staff was available to meet with us, when we stopped at her office so we left our materials and will continue to attempt to follow-up with her office. Otherwise we were met and welcomed by all of the other members of Minnesota’s Congressional delegation and their staffs and were given many assurances of support for our priority concerns and initiatives (shown elsewhere in this newsletter); A great “thanks” to all who took the time and effort to join us in this important event.

Rather than duplicate the effort I am including a report on the State legislative activities that was written by Tommy Johnson of the Hopkins VFW post for this newsletter. This report is as well written and as complete as anything that I can do and so…. Enjoy it.

Finally, as a matter of respect, I wish to acknowledge how much we all missed the presence of Al Loehr, our longtime state legislative chairman and mentor, and this missed presence was acknowledged by all of the Congressional offices. Al, you were very much there with us in spirit, thanks again for your help.

Tommy Johnson, Hopkins Veterans of Foreign Wars Post Quartermaster has been with me during Legislative hearings and committee meetings this session. He has put together this great article for his Post. I would like now pass that on to you.

(the following article originally published in the Geo. R. Wolff VFW Post #425, Hopkins MN April 2014 newsletter)

Monday March 17th was a well-attended Veterans Day On The Hill at the Capitol in St. Paul. After the Colors were posted Retired Major General Larry Shellito, Minnesota Department of Veterans (MDVA) Commissioner, read a letter from Governor Dayton who was not able to attend for medical reasons. This kicked off a series of speeches by Legislators such as Senator Saxhaug, who discussed proposed legislation to be heard by the Senate’s States Departments And Veterans Committee and Dave Senjem, who always gives a moving talk about honoring the sacrifices of veterans and our families. House State Government Finance And Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Mary Murphy talked about how her Committee’s members know the importance of listening to Veterans.

Representative Murphy’s committee does listen, and they listened on March 10th in committee as a parade of Veterans Groups and citizens, including me, objected to proposed legislation HF 2557, which would negatively affect the ability of spouses and widows to be admitted into Minnesota’s five Veterans Homes, including the Minneapolis Veterans Home. Towards the end of the meeting, Chair Murphy asked the proposed bill’s Author who asked for this change as no one testifying that day supported it. The Author answered by saying “other states do that” – which by omission, was a “no one asked” answer. This bill was discussed under Good Of The Order at the March 6th Post meeting.

After Day On The Hill ceremonies ended Veterans and members of the Ladies Auxiliary met with Legislators informally and formally in Members offices. I spoke with Representative Murphy about HF2557, and was told her committee heard loud and clear the proposed changes were not asked for nor were wanted. Rep. Murphy wasn’t sure if the bill would have another hearing – meaning it would not pass out of committee nor reach the house floor for a vote. Conversations with other Legislators were along the same lines – Representatives saying they didn’t think this bill would move forward; Senators saying they didn’t think the bill would even be heard in that Chamber of the Legislature.

One highlight is the sincere care about and for veterans by Members in both parties. It’s refreshing that veterans issues don’t have the political biases too many other issues do. Please remember, the VFW has been, is, and always will be a non-partisan organization.

The point of this is to remind people of the importance of making a phone call, of sending an email, of attending legislative hearings – Legislators can and will listen and we can shape the legislation that affects us. These calls and emails and going to the Capitol are something everyone needs to do – one at the least, two is better, and attendance critically important.. Our work is not over; send an email to HopkinsVFW@gmail.com if, your schedule permitting, you can attend a hearing in St. Paul . To find contact information for your State Representative and State Senator, go to http://www.leg.state.mn.us/leg/DistrictFinder.aspx. We’ll be talking about legislation again at our April 3rd Post Meeting; hope to see you there!