That, Ladies and Gents, is a Tweet from the Independence Party Of Minnesota, the Party that (for now) has Major Party status.

Overwhelmingly, Democrats in Minnesota oppose the GreedOverPrinciples Party’s bigoted and hateful proposal to amend Minnesota’s Constitution by restricting the rights of our LGBT Brothers and Sisters. Specifically, they want to deny the right of our LGBT Sisters and Brothers to marry, thereby insuring Minnesota stays a state where marriage is an institution of “One Man And One Woman (at a time).”

And according to that tweet from the Independence Party, they reject Republican bigotry and hate, too.

Add into that Ron Paul’s strong showing in Minnesota last night, and it looks like Minnesota may be the very first state to reject an anti-LGBT amendment to a State Constitution!

To ensure defeat, there’s a lot of work to be done. Fortunately, Minnesotans United For ALL Families is out there working hard – I saw ‘em at my Caucus Precinct last night, and was told they were all over this great state.

Go show ‘em some love, would ya? When I pledge allegiance to the flag, it ends: “…with Liberty and Justice for all.”

Yes, “all” - which includes my LGBT Brothers and Sisters.

Yours, too.

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject; comments welcome there)

In Part 5 we looked at at the official FEC Complaint – filed 12 Jan 2012 – by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”). In Part 6 we looked at the MN GOP misrepresenting their expenses. In Part & we looked at how the MN GOP categorized pay for a guy that they very well may have been paying to run for state senate – Lakeville’s Dave Thompson in SD-36.

Today in Part 8 of the continuing Cooked Books Series we’re going to take a look at a MN GOP Campaign Finance Report line item that begs the question: did the State GOP pay for a lawyer for a State Representative’s lawyer in a drunk driving case?

Here’s the background: endorsed GOPer 2010 candidate for Governor Tom Emmer’s campaign was getting hammered over alcohol related incidents, including a certain paid campaign staffer that happened to be Emmer’s kid. The campaign did NOT need any more alocohol-related incidents. Apparently, campaign “consultant” Mark Buesgens, state rep from district 35-B, didn’t get the memo – he got caught driving drunk with an open bottle of vodka.

Team Emmer’s Drinking Team promptly dumped Buesgens. Note the “note” at the bottom of the last entry: “final payment.”

(link to image here)

Now, the “official story” put out by Team Emmer’s Drinking Team was: “Hey! It’s just a coincidence, but: just the day before Buesgens got caught driving drunk into the ditch, we ditched him and he went to work for the State GOP!!!”

Yeah, “right.”

Let’s take a look at the timeline, as reported on Buesgen’s court records:

(link to image here)

September 18th, 2010 – Busgens gets caught in a ditch with an open bottle of vodka; blows a .16 blood-alcohol content.

September 24th, 2010 – Buesgens cited in Wright County

November 5th, 2010 – Guilty plea entered, case all but settled (final disposition November 23rd, 2010.

Now, remember how in the scramble to distance themselves from the guy in the ditch (with an open bottle of vodka), Team Emmer’s Drinking Team said “Hey! Buesgen’s isn’t OUR bad boy; he’s the GOP’s!!!”

Well, Buesgens does indeed show up on the State GOP’s state Campaign Finance Report for 2010:

Five days after blowing a .16, Buesgens has the good fortune of getting a check from the State GOP for $2,584.62.

Five days before his drunk driving & open bottle case is all but over, Buesgens pulls another check from FEC Tony & Co for $8, 615.38 — for a grand total of eleven grand: $11,000.00.

Coincidences? Or, do those checks look like “retainer & final payment” to defend a drunk driving & open bottle case?

At any rate, it sure looks like a sweet deal for Buesgens; he goes from about $7k a month with Emmer to $11k with the GOP!!!

I’d ask the State GOP for an explanation of why Buesgen’s $11k paydays – in about a month – was for actual work, and not just a pass-through to Buesgen’s lawyer, but: it’s not like they really like to talk to the ol’ TwoPutter. Not that I – or anyone else for that matter – would/should believe ‘em; after all: reasonable people no longer have any reason to believe anything a GOPer official – party nor elected – has to say.

The State GOP needs to prove that the $11k Buesgens got was for actual work – because it sure looks like it simply paid a defense attorney for the actual work of defending one of their own.

If I were a GOPer, I’d be mad as (heck) to think my political donations went to a defense attorney for a guy that drove drunk into the ditch with an open bottle of vodka.

As a progressive, I’m simply not surprised. After all, today’s GOP is morally bankrupt, intellectually dishonest, and institutionally corrupt.

There’s a LOT more, in the GOP’s state and federal financial reports so:

Stay tuned!

And, let’s hope some prosecutor, somewhere, is thinking: “Isn’t it about time to get a Grand Jury together, and do a little digging ourselves?”

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject.com; comments welcome there)

In

Today in Part 5 of the continuing Cooked Books Series we’re going to take a look at the official FEC Complaint – filed yesterday – by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”).

CREW Files Second FEC Complaint Against Republican Party of Minnesota
January 11th, 2012

Washington, D.C. – Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) against the Republican Party of Minnesota (RPM) and its former chairman and treasurer, Anthony Sutton. The complaint alleges the RPM violated the Federal Election Campaign Act and a conciliation agreement the party signed less than five months ago with the FEC by deliberately hiding its debts from FEC investigators. Back in 2007, CREW had filed a similar complaint against the RPM, leading the FEC to impose a $170,000 fine last summer.

“The Republican Party of Minnesota’s FEC reports haven’t reflected the party’s actual financial condition for nearly a decade and make a mockery of the public’s right to know,” said CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan. “There appears to be ample evidence Mr. Sutton, repeatedly lied to FEC investigators for years to achieve the party’s political goals. Party officials signed a conciliation agreement with the FEC pledging the party would clean up its act and – less than six months later – we discover absolutely nothing has changed.” (more, here)

OK, a little about that $170,000 fine – the MN GOP had to make a $20,000 down payment; it agreed to pay off the remaining $150,000 debt in ten equal installments. I’m just putting this paragraph in because I enjoy seeing this picture of a GOPer check to the Feds! I’ll be even happier when I can link to a picture of a MN GOPer doing a perp walk, though….

Back to CREW’s complaint:

On December 30, 2011, the RPM held a news conference to announce the party had conducted an internal review revealing $2 million in debts, including $415,211 that had never been reported to the FEC. According to party officials, they had been fighting with party treasurer Anthony Sutton over the release of party financial information, but had been unable to obtain the records until Sutton resigned. As RPM’s treasurer, Sutton appears to have filed false reports with the FEC.

Federal law requires state committees like the RPM to disclose all outstanding debts and obligations. In addition, knowingly and willfully filing false reports with the FEC is a federal crime. (more, here)

“…knowlingly and willfully filing false reports with the FEC is a federal crime.”

Bring on the Perp Walk!!!

OK, a little more from/for Part 4 of the continuing Cooked Books Series. We demonstrated how the MN GOP reported the address of a registered vendor – “Fundraising Assoicates” – as a duplex a few miles away from their actual registered address (“7705 Tanglewood Court“). We went on to point out that “Fundraising Associates” had it’s registered address appear on a FEC report filed by a Michele Bachmann related entity just around a year earlier, in 2010 (“4035 W. 65th Street“).

While perusing the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board’s 2010 report by the MN GOP, this item jumped out!

Yep! In 2010, the MN GOP reported to the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board the correct address of “Fundraising Associates” – in 2011, they put down an apparently bogus address.

How does that happen? WHY does that happen? Was it deliberate?

Let’s go back to CREW’s Melanie Sloan:

“The Republican Party of Minnesota’s FEC reports haven’t reflected the party’s actual financial condition for nearly a decade and make a mockery of the public’s right to know. There appears to be ample evidence Mr. Sutton, repeatedly lied to FEC investigators for years to achieve the party’s political goals.”

“There appears to be ample evidence Mr. Sutton repeatedly lied…”

Yep – sure is! Even on the little stuff, such as where a vendor does business.

Which reminds me of what then-RNC Chair Michael Steele once said: “You have absolutely no reason – none – to trust our words or our actions at this point.”

Stay tuned – the best is yet to come!

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject; comments welcome there)

Today in Part 4 of the continuing Cooked Books Series we’re going to take a look at how a reasonable person has no reason to believe anything a Republican says a vendor and what appears to be a fake address. While perusing the December 20th, 2011 MN GOP Federal Elections Commission (“FEC”) filing – covering the month of November 2011 – the following stuck out. Why? Because there simply isn’t an address in Minneapolis that has a street number of “7705.” Let’s look!

(link to FEC Report here)

OK, to recap so far: we know that you can’t believe what Republicans say, ESPECIALLY in FEC reports – after all, on December 20th, 2011 the MN GOP reported they only owed $542,005 when the real number was double that — and possibly closer to a cool $2 million. And, of course, there’s that $170,000 fine theFEC smacked ‘em with just a few months ago…

So when an address shows up with a street number that can’t possibly be in the city they say, well – that bears some digging into. And a simple mapquest search shows that that address is NOT in Minneapolis!

We’ll start with the company – “Fundraising Associates” – first. If you go to the Minnesota Secretary Of State’s office, you’ll find that “Fundraising Associates is in fact a bona fide company. Except, as noted in the preceeding link, it’s NOT at “7705 Tanglewood Court” – it’s registered at “4035 W 65th Street #427, Edina MN 55435.” And it’s registered to a “Zandra Wolcott.”

What type of building is “4035 W 65th Street”? It’s an apartment building. OK, no big deal there; a lot of people work out of their homes these days. But, what is “7705 Tanglewood Court”? It’s a duplex, smack dab in the middle of a residential area in Edina.

So, why would the MN GOP have a “Payee address” for a company that’s registered and apparently working out of an apartment listed to a duplex some other place? Hmmm….

… Better check the property tax records! Here’s what they show:

Owner Name: Golden Valley Microwave FDS
Taxpayer Name & Address: Norman M Gabrick, 4910 Malibu Drive, Edina 55346
Homestead Status: Non-Homestead

Who is “Golden Valley Microwave FDS”? A quick googlesearch indicates that it’s now a subsidiary of ConAgra Foods.

ConAgra Foods??!? Why is a vendor’s check going to a duplex owned by ConAgra Foods??!?

It’s not like “Fundraising Associates” hasn’t been listed on FEC Reports before… let’s look!

Yep – in 2010, in a “Minnesota-Bachmann Victory Committee” FEC Report, Zandra Wolcott was reported as receiving $25,000 — at the address registered with the MN Secretary Of State.

But now, a year later and now a MN GOP vendor, her checks are being sent to a “non-homestead” (read=”rental”) duplex a couple of miles away from her apartment/registered business address?

Why? Is that duplex just a sham address? Or is the MN GOP claiming that the money went to Wolcott, but it was really sent to someone else?

Those questions (and more!) I didn’t get to ask Zandra Wolcott. Here’s the only question I got to ask:

“When you gave your bills to the MN GOP, did you use your business address or an address for a duplex a few miles away from your office?”

I got to ask it, but: no answer. In an exceedingly short phone conversation, Ms. Wolcott referred me to Pat Shortridge at the MN GOP — and her attorney, Tony Trimble.

Yes, Tony “Recount” Trimble – the MN GOP lawyer, who’s recount bills the MN GOP may try to weasel out of paying.

Say, there’s a plan! Ask questions about a fishy FEC transaction to a former ENRON lobbyist – now running the MN GOP – and a lawyer that the MN GOP probably owes big bucks to! One can easily assume a response along the lines of “not intended to be a factual statement”, or, perhaps, “I only lied because I had to”…

What we know, is there’s (stuff) in the MN GOP’s campaign finance reports that’s simply not true.

What we don’t know is who put down what appears to be a fake address on an FEC report – the vendor, or the MN GOP? And why?

And how many OTHER fake addresses has the MN GOP reported to the FEC?

In digging into this one, I’ve been hearing allegations of shell LLC’s and other sham addresses, etc that the MN GOP has been reporting.

So stay tuned — the best is yet to come!!!

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject.com; comments welcome there)

Today in Part 3 of the continuing Cooked Books Series, we’re going to take a quick look at one thing that got the MN GOP into trouble last time, and how it sure looks like it’ll keep them in trouble this time. As CREW’s Melanie Sloan noted on Minnesota Public Radio just the other day:

“We seem to be seeing a repeat of the same kind of problems with the Republican Party’s finances,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington D.C. (More, at MPR.org)

Back in February 2007, long time MN GOP employee Dwight Tostenson sent a memo to the GOP’s Executive Committee outling what he thought were – to paraphrase – real bad accounting. REAL bad. One thing Tostenson noted was the Party was taking employee payroll deductions for retirement accounts — but NOT depositing the deductions into the employee’s retirement accounts! That, Ladies and Gentlemen, is a HUGE “no no”! At that time, MN GOP employee retirement accounts were being administered by American Express Financial. American Express Financial was later spun off to become “Ameriprise Financial”.

On the December (covering the preceeding month,November) RPM (“Republican Party of Minnesota”) FEC Filing, Schedule D lists a debt owed to Ameriprise Financial Services in the amount of $7,636.64. “Nature of Debt” was listed as “Administrative/Salary/Overhead FEA Empl” — here it is:

(link to above)

This interested me, because in The Tostenson Memo, prepared by former MN GOP Staffer Dwight Tostenson, one of his allegations was that the MN GOP was taking payroll deductions for employee retirement purposes, and not depositing said withholdings into the employee’s retirement accounts – administered by Ameriprise American Express.

So I looked in the MN GOP FEC Schedule B Filings – Disbursements – for the month, and found no disbursements to Ameriprise.

Nor was there a disbursement in the preceeding months of October (Filing #753549), September #750371, August #745520, July #742600, June #737692, May #731962, nor April #729605.

But I noticed a funny thing, as I worked back to April – until April’s FEC Filing, the debt to Ameriprise never changed – always $7,636.64 on Schedule D (Debts and Obligations)

In April, the MN GOP’s Schedule D reported Ameriprise twice – the first time, $3133.85 – same “Nature of Debt” as above.

The second listing for Ameriprise, in the amount of $1,000.62, has “Standard Transfer: FEA Employees IRA Con” as the “Nature of Debt.”

Now, I’m not saying that the debt to Ameriprise Financial reported all those months in 2011 ($7,636.64) is in fact payroll deductions for deposits into employee retirement accounts – I’m not saying that at all.

But I will repeat what Mealanie Sloan of CREW said, above:

“We seem to be seeing a repeat of the same kind of problems with the Republican Party’s finances,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington D.C. (More, at MPR.org)

Yep! Sure seems to be a repeat!

And a willful one at that.

I’m going to continue to dig into the financial disaster brought about by the alleged “Party of Fiscal Responsibility” – that’s becoming known as the MN GOP’s Cooked Books Scandal.

Hopefully, some one in the law enforcement persuasion will, too.

Because really: Does anyone expect the newly elected MN GOP Chair “ENRON Pat” Shortridge to?

Stay tuned!

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject; comments welcome there)

OK, that’s a screenshot of the MN GOP’s latest Federal Elections Commission (“FEC”) filing, signed just over a week ago (December 20th, 2011). Look at Line 10 – “Debts and Obligations Owed BY the Committee” – and the number, “$542,005.12.”

As reported to the FEC, just over a week ago.

What do we see reported today, here in the land of FEC Tony Sutton, the recently deposed Burrito Barron of the MN GOP?

Sources: State GOP debt is about $2 million
by Paul Demko and Briana Bierschbach
Published: December 29,2011

An internal review of the Republican Party of Minnesota’s finances has determined that the party is responsible for about $2 million in debts, according to two sources familiar with the findings. That’s nearly twice as much as previously thought.

According to these sources, party officials will report about $1.3 million in debt when they announce the findings of the probe at a press conference on Friday. But that figure does not include a number of debts that the party reportedly plans to contest, including roughly $450,000 in legal bills stemming from the 2010 gubernatorial recount. (more, here)

Why does anybody believe ANYTHING today’s GOP says??!?

And as I write this, the MN State GOP is conducting a “debate” to replace FEC Tony (deposed for financial mismangement) — and a leading “candidate” is a (I am NOT making this up) former ENRON lobbyist??!?

You Couldn’t Trust The GOP Then, You Still Can’t Now, And Tomorrow Won’t Be Any Different

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject; comments welcome there)

My nephew gave it to me; the lad clearly knows where the ol’ TwoPutter stands; clearly knows his uncle’s sense o’ humor!

Here’s the story behind it: back in 2009, when all those freeloading Teabaggers were protesting and screaming (stuff) like “get your gov’t hands off my MediCare!”, some freeloading Teabaggers planned a protest/march down the street in downtown Bozeman, Montana. Except, being typical freeloading Teabaggers, they weren’t gonna cover the costs to the taxpayers for their protest of taxpayer expenditures run amok. Cute, eh? It’s even better – they weren’t even from Bozeman, but thought the taxapayers of Bozeman should cover their costs anyway. Well, a local Bozemanian (“Bozemanite”?) … well, here’s what John Leland thought, in his own words, in a story about his group’s march, in 2010:

“Last year the irony of the Tea Party insisting on shutting down Main Street was that the closure costs were estimated at $1,100 that they would have to pay staff to close the street down for a parade to protest taxation and government spending,” said Leland. “The irony was just too much. So we formed the Coalition and raised enough money not only to offset the closure costs, but also the majority of the Tea Party’s closure costs as well.” (Bozeman Daily Chronicle).

So in the spring of 2009, when Leland heard about Teabaggers planning a July 4th, 2009 protest that was going to cost the taxpayers some dough, he decided to mock, ridicule and scorn ‘em. But, he found out he’d have to have a “group” to get a permit – so he formed the afore-mentioned “Green Coalition Of Gay Loggers For Jesus” and proceeded to fundraise – one of the ways was by selling the tee shirt so proudly worn by yours truly, above. The group then held their parade immediately before the Teabaggers!

Now, what did said Teabaggers have to say in their defense?

Organizers of the Tea Party who have said they do not oppose Leland’s march do contend that it would set a dangerous precedent to require protestors to pay for a demonstration, since it is a constitutionally protected right. (DANIEL PERSON Chronicle Staff Writer)

Too funny!!! What are the Teabaggers saying about the Occupy Wall Street movement these days??!?

The problem with Teabaggers and today’s Greed Over Principles party is they cannot be shamed, for they have no shame.

But they CAN be mocked, ridiculed, and scorned.

And they SHOULD be. Frequently. Why?

You Couldn’t Trust Them Then, You Still Can’t Now, And Tomorrow Won’t Be Any Different. Although, this week might be interesting in the Legislature. Oh – and the deeply in debt MN GOP might elect a former Enron Lobbyist as their party chair on Friday!

So I’ll wear my shirt with pride!

The “Top Ten Reasons” for buying their shirt (well, for Christmas, anyway) is below, with links to their webpage and Facebook page – enjoy!

And stay tuned for coverage of this week’s shenanigans from the Greed Over Principles party!

Find ‘em on the InnerTubz! —> Green Coalition of Gay Loggers For Jesus webpage

“Like” ‘em on Facebook! —> Green Coalition of Gay Loggers For Jesus Facebook page

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject; comments welcome there)

Among his admirers, he was regarded as a good strategist, particularly in crafting a message to changing events. His mentor at the Republican Party, former chairman Tony Sutton, once said he carried the party’s message “whatever the personal costs to himself.” He carried it even into the lion’s den, such as when he strolled through the DFL state convention in Duluth last year to give his take to reporters. (emphasis added)

Yes, Brodkorb was in Duluth at the Convention, wearing DFL duly issued credentials for the loyal opposition. And that’s the way it should be; an open forum for all to see with one caveat: you show up, sign in, and only after signing in do you go in.

Even Brodkorb agrees with that; or, at least, he SAID he does – let’s look!

Now, next Friday, in St. Cloud, a whole bunch of media types will be attending – and be issued media credentials – for what looks to be a real food fight at the GOP’s Central Committee Meeting. I know that; I asked a couple media types.

What was the official GOP response to the ol’ TwoPutter’s media request, to the official GOP Spokestool, Craig “Firmly Embedded” Westover?

From: Two Putt Tommy
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 6:58 AM
To: Craig J. Westover
Subject: Media Credentials

Mr. Westover,

I’d like Media Credentials to cover the 12-31-11 State Central Committee Meeting.

Please advise.

Tommy Johnson
follow me on twitter! http://twitter.com/twoputttommy

From: cjw@mngop.com
To: TwoPuttTommy
CC: zjf@mngop.com; hldr@mngop.com; kaf@mngop.com
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:32:28 -0600
Subject: RE: Media Credentials

In keeping with long-standing Party policy, your request for Media Credentials to cover the 12-31 State Central Committee is NOT granted.

Craig Westover
Communications Director
Republican Party of Minnesota

I might go there anyway, and livetweet the food fight from the outside. But here’s the point: for all the “honest and open and transparent” BS that GOPers spew – from Party Officials down to the GrassRoots – GOPers are anything but.

In April of 2010, GOPers held their state convention in Minneapolis – AFTER, as noted above, Brodkorb as GOPer Deputy freely strolled through the DFL Convention in Duluth. I covered that event through twitter and in 3 posts – the first entitled “Fear And Loathing In Sloganville, Part 1 – or… A Peak Through The Flaps Of The Small Tent Party”.

I’ll start this post out dealing with the Fear Factor! As expected yesterday, Minnesota’s GOPers weren’t gonna give the ol’ TwoPutter Media Credentials. But, that’s no surprise; they didn’t credential The UpTake, either. As a matter o’ fact, the MN GOP is none-too-keen about letting “just anyone in” to see the goings ons o’ their party; no one – and I mean NO ONE – can wander on in and watch how The Small Tent Party conducts their business, without bein’ approved to do said watching.

One wonders what would happen, were a teacher to bring a coupla kids down to the Mpls Convention Center, for a teachable moment about democracy – GOPer Style. I’m guessing it would be a real teachable moment; GOPers refusing school kids to watch ‘em in action!!!

Remember how Brodkorb, in that video, talked about how responsive the DFL was to his credential requests? The GOP? Not so much. From that post:

Here’s the tweet, about my exchange with MN GOP Communications Director Mark Drake concerning my Media Credentials:

Drake: “U didn’t rgstr in time” Me: “What was deadline?” Drake: “Didn’t u get my memo?” Me: “U r a funny guy, Mark”
#mngop10 #Stribpol
about 14 hours ago via web

Drake’s a GOPer!

He – like Brodkorb, like every other GOPer in a position to abuse authority I’ve ever met, is a GOPer that simply can’t resist jerking people. I eventually got in, even after following all their rules – rules they seemed intent to break. In a nutshell: GOPer rules stated credentialed attendees could bring in “guests” provided they registered and paid an entrance fee. So a fellow veteran – disgusted with the way the ol’ TwoPutter was getting jerked around – sponsored me and let me take a $20 out of my pocket to get in to the convention. Follow the rules, get in right away ?

Of course not – we’re talking the Greed Over Principles party here.

I eventually got in; they eventually figured out the ol’ TwoPutter wasn’t going away and it simply got too embarrassing to keep me on the outside tweeting in.

Which in a way was surprising – it’s not often one can shame today’s GOP.

This little story is but one example of the hypocrisy ingrained in today’s GOP.

It’s one more reminder, it’s today’s example, of what GOPer Michael Steele said back in February of 2009: “you have absolutely no reason – none – to trust our words or actions at this point”.

You couldn’t trust the GOP then, you can’t now, and tomorrow won’t be any different.

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject.com; comments welcome there)

Here’s the lede and a snippet:

Former top Koch staffer raised concerns about her conduct months ago
by Tom Scheck, Minnesota Public Radio,
Catharine Richert, Minnesota Public Radio
.
.
Michel acknowledged that Sheehan’s comments contradict the comments he and three other senators made to reporters on Friday. At that time, Michel said the allegations about Koch’s behavior were first reported to them a few weeks ago. Michel said he wasn’t honest about the timeline in an attempt to protect Sheehan and other staffers.
.
.
(more, and I suggest you read it here)

So, Michel only lied when he has to? Or, is it safe to say “Michel only lies when he has to”?

“Right” now, Michel is only the “Interim Senate Majority Leader.” Smart money should wager despite Michel’s role in this whole sordid affair, he’ll be endorsed for re-election in the Greed Over Principles Party anyway. Of course, if that happens, he might simply be the “Interim Senator from Edina.”

What Michel really is, is today’s example of what GOPer Michael Steele said back then: “you have absolutely no reason – none – to trust our words or actions at this point”.

True then, true now, and tomorrow won’t be any different. Nixon would be proud.

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject.com; comments welcome there)

Before we get to ‘em, I’d like to point out what I said earlier today, when I updated the original “The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same, or… how Zellers’ election demonstrates – once again – that GOP still stands for GreedOverPrinciples.”, posted back in June of ’09:

There’s a fight in the MN GOP for the Chair position – and it’s roots go back to “The Tostenson Memo” and the 2008 MN GOP State Convention in Rochester. And it’s coming to a boil. Why? Because GOPers covered up their mess back then; and some of those same GOPers are doin’ their best to KEEP it covered up. (more, here)

And indeed it does go back to the GOP State Convention in Rochester MN, back in 2008! For a quick trip back to what happened then, here’s what I wrote back then! It’s called “Fear And Loathing In Rochester”. From it:

What everyone needs to remember is that the fact the Republican Party Of Minnesota’s financial problems have been under discussion for a year is a) the result of Republicans airing their own financial problems, and b) republiCon Ron refusing to face the problem publicly. Indeed, not only is republiCon Ron is still trying to hide this problem, he refuses to answer questions about it.

Yep – way back in 2008, financial mismanagement by the State GOP was a topic of conversation for a year! And, 4 years later, it still is!

OK, so who was GOPer Party Treasurer in 2008, before Tony Sutton took the Party Chair position in 2009?

Yep! FEC Tony was GOPer Treasurer, before he was GOPer Chair!

Above, in “Fear And Loathing In Rochester” we touched on the GOPer Party Establishment refusing to deal with the financial reformers at the 2008 Rochester Convention; but there was another dynamic at work – Ron Paul’s 2008 bid for the GOP Nomination! There were a bunch of Ron Paul supporters there; and the Party Establishment was none-too-happy to see them – or, even Ron Paul! In fact, GOPer Leadership refused to let Ron Paul address the GOP Convention.

Here’s what GOPer Blogger Martin Andrade wrote about the convention, back then:

At the MNGOP State Convention
Posted on May 30, 2008 by Marty Andrade

Notes and Thoughts from the Convention Floor:
.
.
-There are two different factions, the establishment faction called “Minnesota Conservative Delegate Team” and among the notable people on this list are Norm Coleman and Tim Pawlenty. The other faction, from what I can tell, is called “The Conservative Conscience Coalition” and these are partly Ron Paul supporters.
.
.
-On that contention, I will say I think the process was unfair this year. Ron Paul people were kept off the ballot, there were no nominations from the floor allowed, people were forced to vote for a certain number of people and there was some behind the scenes stuff I didn’t see. It is this attempt to silence dissent which upset me.
.
.
-Unfortunately, a great portion of the Ron Paul people were not allowed to speak nor were they on the ballot.

So, who was that “Minnesota Conservative Delegate Team” that dissed the Ron Paul people? Let’s look!

That’s their FEC Statement Of Organization, signed 5-27-2008 and received by the FEC on June 5th, 2008 – AFTER the convention closed. Hmmm….

So, where did the “Minnesota Conservative Delegate Team” get their dough? Let’s look!

Hmmm… from OpenSecrets.org, a project of the Center for Responsive Politics – a list of “major donors ($200+)” to the Minnesota Conservative Delegate Team… hmmm….

Brandon Salawich, 5-22-08: $3,000
Michael Vekich, 5-22-08: $1,000
Michael Brodkorb, 7-2-08: $500

I recognize those names!

As a matter o’ fact, Vekich just made the news, earlier today! From Minnesota Public Radio:

Vekich will advise state GOP on finances
Posted at 12:57 PM on December 12, 2011 by Tim Pugmire

The Republican Party of Minnesota has turned to businessman and accountant Mike Vekich to help clean up its financial problems.

The party’s acting chairwoman Kelly Fenton announced today that Vekich, who is CEO of Vekich Associates, will provide voluntary assistance until Dec. 31. That’s when the party’s state central committee is scheduled to elect a new chair.

In a news release, Fenton said Vekich may enlist others in his evaluation of party finances, if necessary. (more, here)

OK, so what did this “Minnesota Conservative Delegate Team” do? Well, let’s go to RonPaul.com and get their take, o’ what was done unto them!!!

Minnesota GOP: “Vote for McCain and Shut Up!”
20 Responses
by RonPaul.com on May 28, 2008
.
.
In Minnesota, John McCain got only 22% of the vote in the state’s caucuses on February 5, compared with Ron Paul’s 16%. The Minnesota party establishment is concerned enough to send out an unsigned letter to GOP members, signed only as “Friends of the Minnesota Conservative Delegate Team”.

In a chilling attack on free speech and open discussion among Republicans, the missive exhorts GOP members to attend the State Convention this Friday and assist the party establishment in stifling the growing number of dissenting voices:
.
.

And RonPaul.com goes on to reprint the “misive” sent out to GOPers. Want to read it? Go here.

Want to find out who produced it? Go to the FEC reports!!!

Well, based on the sketchy FEC Reports, it has to be these folks:

OK, let’s review: the 2008 GOP State Convention in Rochester was notable for 2 reasons – Chair Carey and Treasurer Sutton shouted down those that dared question Party Finances that ultimately resulted in a #170,000 FEC fine, and they shut out the Ron Paul Supporters.

Prior to, and at that Convention, Establishment GOPers passed out lit dissing Ron Paul supporters (at that time, many “establishment” GOPers were dissing those same Ron Paul supporters as “PaulBots” and “Ronulans”). Current Candidate for GOPer Chair, Brandon Sawalich, tossed down $3k to the group that prepared the lit before the convention, AND BEFORE THE GROUP filed their FEC paperwork.

And with a hat tip to deposed GOP Chair Tony Sutton, apparently the “Minnesota Ceonservative Delegate Team” didn’t bother paying off the bill to the prepareruntil months later.

And a few years later, Sawalich is running on a platform with a key bullet point, and I quote:

“Financial integrity and transparency”

Yeah, “right.” Only if “integrity” means “sweep it” and “transparency” means “under a rug.”

In Minnesota’s Greed Over Principles party, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject.com; comments welcome there)