Then – Richard Nixon interviewed, in 1977:

David Frost: “Would you say that there are certain situations – and the Huston Plan was one of them – where the president can decide that it’s in the best interests of the nation, and do something illegal?”

Richard Nixon: “Well, when the president does it, that means it is not illegal.” (Guardian.uk)

Now – D*ck Cheney interviewed, 2009:

WALLACE: So even these cases where they went beyond the specific legal authorization, you’re OK with it?

CHENEY: I am. (FauxNews.com)

Ladies and Gentlemen, just another example of when the Party Of Nixon breaks laws, they say laws don’t matter.

(originally published at MnProgressiveProject.com)

Tagged with:
 

Last Monday, TheHill.com reported:

The ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.), and the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), were among nine GOP senators who sent a letter last week to Holder urging him to back off from the idea of appointing the special prosecutor.(TheHill.com)

Way to go, guys!!! Ehrlichman, Haldeman, G. Gordon and the boys would have loved to have you in the senate, way back when!!!

Torture and potential crimes have been discussed here on MnProgressive Project recently. I’ve posted two; once last Friday in a post entitled “The GOP’s Tortured Logic” and again last Monday, in a post entitled Special Prosecutor Appointed To Probe Potential Bush Administration Crimes, Grace Kelly weighed in yesterday, in a post entitled “St. Thomas Law Professor Robert Delahunty’s “Torture Memos”", and twice by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley; last Friday in a post entitled “Homework Assignment for St. Thomas Law School on Torture” and again yesterday, in a post entitled “Calling Out the Torture Enablers at St. Thomas Law School”. The facts are there….sadly, so are GOPer “talking points”. And no one carries the water does the talking points for GOPers better than Billo The Clown Bill O’Reilly. Let’s watch!

Now, here’s the exchange that “highlights” the GOP’s position that when they break laws, laws don’t matter:

FLOYD: That pressure has been on to investigate what went on in these interrogations since long before Eric Holder had this job. And yes, it is correct that Obama has said from the beginning that he wants to look forward.

O’REILLY: Yeah, and he’s smart to do that. Right.

FLOYD: And he doesn’t want to look back.

O’REILLY: Right.

FLOYD: And that’s a political choice. And it’s probably a wise strategy, but Eric Holder is not in a political job.

O’REILLY: Yeah, but he can get fired.

FLOYD: That’s right, he can, but you can’t make decisions as attorney general because you’re afraid of getting fired.

O’REILLY: But how many attorney generals did Nixon fire? He fired one a week.

O
M
G.

Not only is Billo The Clown claiming that “prosecutorial discretion” should preclude Attorney General Holder from investigating torture crimes, Billo The Clown is using Nixon – NIXON – as a reason why Attorney General Holder shouldn’t be investigating crimes of torure!!!

(Hat Tip to CrooksAndLiars.com)

O’REILLY: “Unresolved problem” segment tonight, President Obama’s on record as saying he does not want to prosecute CIA agents, who may have broken rules and laws and interrogating terror suspects after 9/11. However, Attorney General Eric Holder has now decided to appoint a prosecutor to investigate about dozen cases of alleged CIA wrongdoing, while interrogating the terror suspects. And he wants to see if crimes were committed.

Justice Department official John Durham will head the probe. And with us now to analyze, attorney and Democratic strategist Jami Floyd.

So this will make the ACLU happy, but I don’t think it’s going to make Barack Obama happy.

JAMI FLOYD, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Well, that’s not Holder’s job. You know, I think being A.G. is the hardest job in the administration because you’re not working for the president. You’re working for us. You’re working for the constitution. You’ve got to do what’s right by the constitution and by the laws of the United States. And if the special prosecutor is what’s needed here, that’s what he’s got to do.

O’REILLY: Yeah, but you know.

FLOYD: .whether Obama likes it or not.

O’REILLY: .there are – I just don’t know. I know Holder and Obama are friends. So I’m not going to say that Holder did – they’re not playing some subterfuge game. They may be, excuse, but you know there’s prosecutional discretion on most everything.

And in this case, all the polls show that Americans do not want this. They think it’s a witch-hunt. And even the old memos that he’s going by, this is at the end of the memo. And you will not see this on any other news program. The memo that Holder is going by to appoint the special prosecutor says, “The CIA’s interrogation program was an absolute success in protecting Americans from another attack and that includes waterboarding and all of that. “Absolute success. ”

FLOYD: The 2004 memo.

O’REILLY: That’s what this is.

FLOYD: .goes back to 2004.

O’REILLY: Right.

FLOYD: .in the Bush administration.

O’REILLY: Right.

FLOYD: That pressure has been on to investigate what went on in these interrogations since long before Eric Holder had this job. And yes, it is correct that Obama has said from the beginning that he wants to look forward.

O’REILLY: Yeah, and he’s smart to do that. Right.

FLOYD: And he doesn’t want to look back.

O’REILLY: Right.

FLOYD: And that’s a political choice. And it’s probably a wise strategy, but Eric Holder is not in a political job.

O’REILLY: Yeah, but he can get fired.

FLOYD: That’s right, he can, but you can’t make decisions as attorney general because you’re afraid of getting fired.

O’REILLY: But how many attorney generals did Nixon fire? He fired one a week.

FLOYD: I’m thinking about Nixon. I’m thinking about Nixon.

O’REILLY: Okay. All right, now.

FLOYD: But you can’t be thinking about Nixon if you’re attorney general.

O’REILLY: I don’t trust Eric Holder. I’ll tell you why. He’s the guy that wanted Marc Rich to be pardoned. Do you know who Marc Rich is?

FLOYD: I know all about Mark Rich.

O’REILLY: Okay, he’s.

FLOYD: I know about Scooter Libby, too.

O’REILLY: Who went to Bill Clinton on the last day of the Clinton administration, who pleaded Marc Rich.

FLOYD: This is not.

O’REILLY: Wait, wait, wait, Jami, who pleaded Marc Rich’s case. The biggest tax cheat in American history, Holder goes in second in command in the Justice Department.

FLOYD: Bill.

O’REILLY: .says Mr. President.

FLOYD: Bill?

O’REILLY: .give this giant tax cheat a pardon.

FLOYD: Bill, the big news of today is the memo. It’s not Marc Rich.

O’REILLY: But it’s.

FLOYD: It’s the 2004 memo.

O’REILLY: I just tell you why I don’t trust him.

FLOYD: Look.

O’REILLY: Unless you can explain to me why he did that, I don’t trust this guy.

FLOYD: But here’s the good news if you don’t trust him. Here’s the good news. He has now appointed.

O’REILLY: Yeah?

FLOYD: .another man, a prosecutor, independent of Eric Holder, a prosecutor, independent.

O’REILLY: Yeah.

FLOYD: .who is a special prosecutor.

O’REILLY: Yeah.

FLOYD: .who is now going to look into this matter.

O’REILLY: Right.

FLOYD: .that has been on the table since 2004. Since before Eric Holder’s time. The pressure has been on the Justice Department for years.

O’REILLY: From whom? The ACLU.

FLOYD: No.

O’REILLY: Not from the folks.

FLOYD: No, no, no.

O’REILLY: The folks don’t want it.

FLOYD: But the pressure has been on from all sectors.

O’REILLY: What sectors?

FLOYD: Having to do with the memos of John, you, and others. Having to do with what went on in Abu Ghraib.

O’REILLY: There’s no – wait, wait, Jami, you’re crazy.

FLOYD: Having to do.

O’REILLY: Obama doesn’t want it. O’Reilly doesn’t want it. Those are the two most powerful people in the country. All right?

(LAUGHTER)

FLOYD: The big O’s aren’t the question.

O’REILLY: All the polls say 65 percent.

FLOYD: The big goal.

O’REILLY: .don’t want it.

FLOYD: The big goal is not the question.

O’REILLY: There is no pressure.

FLOYD: The big O’s aren’t the question. The question is the constitution and the federal law on torture.

O’REILLY: Oh, stop, stop.

FLOYD: .and whether it’s violated.

O’REILLY: It’s totally discretionary.

FLOYD: All that’s being looked at here is whether or not there’s enough evidence to investigate.

O’REILLY: That’s true.

FLOYD: If there’s not enough evidence.

O’REILLY: That’s true.

FLOYD: .we move on.

O’REILLY: All right.

FLOYD: If there’s evidence, we indict.

O’REILLY: Leon Panetta issues a statement today to his guys and says we don’t want this. And then.

FLOYD: Well.

O’REILLY: Mukasey.

FLOYD: See, that’s a CIA.

O’REILLY: Right.

FLOYD: Of course he doesn’t want it.

O’REILLY: That’s a good point, but Panetta’s a Democrat. Says I don’t want. Mukasey, the former CIA guys go, hey, if do you this, Holder, no foreign country is going to cooperate with the United States and intel gathering because they don’t want to be dragged into any scandal. So we’re going to lose all intel drying up around the world. And you might be killed because of it, Jami.

FLOYD: This is not about politics. This is not about party.

O’REILLY: See, you’re totally ignoring my question.

FLOYD: This is about — you didn’t ask a question.

O’REILLY: I did. You made a statement.

O’REILLY: You made statement.

O’REILLY: You may be killed because of this crazy decision by Holder.

FLOYD: We have federal laws on torture for a reason. We can’t just violate them willy-nilly. And if they’ve been violated, we need to prosecute.

O’REILLY: You go any war, you could have prosecuted Abraham Lincoln for suspending habeas corpus.

FLOYD: Okay, look, they’re going to investigate.

O’REILLY: Okay?

FLOYD: We’ll see what they find.

O’REILLY: Yeah.

FLOYD: And then you’ll have me back. And we’ll talk about what they found.

O’REILLY: I’ll have you back if you’re alive.

FLOYD: I’ll be alive, Bill.

O’REILLY: You may be killed because the terrorists — all of that stuff’s going to dry up according to Mukasey.

FLOYD: I`ll be alive Bill O’Reilly.

O’REILLY: I’m sorry, Hayden . I made a mistake. I said it’s Mukasey. It’s Hayden. Michael Hayden. All right? Do I have that right? I hope I do. Yes, Hayden.

FLOYD: Yes, it’s Hayden.

O’REILLY: Michael.

FLOYD: Mukasey was at Justice.

O’REILLY: You know, I can’t keep track of them all. Jami Floyd, everybody.

(crossposted from MnProgressiveProject.com)

“When I picked the Secretary of Education I wanted somebody who knew something about public education.” George orWell Bush, April 30th, 2003 (The White House)

Amazing, isn’t it? Bush The Lesser goes deep (for him) on why he made the pick for Secretary of Education, at a White House Ceremony honoring the 2003 “National Teacher Of The Year.” I’m sure the Honoree and runners-up needed THAT explanation. So, ya hafta wonder if there are any other Boy Blunderisms in this gathering to honor American Education, doncha?

Well, Boy Blunder isn’t to be misunderestimated!

From that speech:

“In 2001, we passed what’s called The No Child Left Behind legislation. I love that phrase, because it’s a commitment of our nation to make sure that not only does every child excel, but no child gets left behind.”

Gee – does Dumbya think some of those that excell get left behind? Possibly – very possibly. After all, his own world experience is those in his world that (cheney) up do just fine, but then again, he was born with a silver coke-spoon in his nose. And what’s a little insider stock trading, when your daddy – Bush The Elder – is president?

Boy Blunder’s misAdmininstration is littered with people that not only shouldn’t have been hired (“Brownie, you’re doin’ a heckuva job” immediately comes to mind) but should have been fired for blatant incompetence – such as Doug Feith, whom General Tommy Franks called “The dumbest mother(cheney)er on the planet.”

Paul Wolfowitz as Rumsfeld’s Deputy was wrong about everything; from how much it would cost to how many troops it would take to how long it would last. For Wolfowitz’ comedy tragedy of errors, he was rewarded with a promotion.

George orWell Bush will ultimately get his just rewards, and January 20th 2009 will be The End Of An Error.

(originally published at MnBlue.com)

On January 10th, 2008, it was noted that Candidate Erik Paulsen had his new website up and running, but: while there was a distinct lack of information, they made it plenty easy to send dough. They didn’t tell you, back then, why you should send dough; they just told you to send it.

And it has been noted on several occasions on several blogs over these last several months that apparently, to Erik Paulsen, Iraq does not exist – that when “Iraq” is entered into the search field of Paulsen’s website, “No items contained the text “iraq” is the result.

Looking at Paulsen’s website, this is still true, – as of this very moment.

On the other hand, at this very moment, on Erik Paulsen’s home page, Team Paulsen touts this item:

Newsroom
Paulsen Over $1.3 Million For Campaign

Funny, isn’t it? That sometimes, the more things change, the more they stay the same? The change is the time since January; what is the same is Paulsen still doesn’t have anything to say about Iraq, but still is talking about the dough.

Of course, Paulsen really doesn’t have to say a lot about anything on is website, on virtually any issue – excepting, of course, dough. And he really doesn’ have (nor, want) to say anything where some those $1.3 million chunks of dough came from – such as the fundraiser with Cheney, or the dough raised at the strip-club in Vegas.

The most ironic statement on Paulsen’s website, is this:

“Minnesotans want leaders to understand that America is at a crossroads. Our economy, our domestic security, and our standing as a world leader all deserve something more substantial than governing by sound bites,” said Paulsen.(emphasis added)

Ladies and Gentlemen, Paulsen’s website, since January, has been nothing but soundbites; and it still is.

This, of course, only goes to show that when Paulsen declared last January that in this race he wouldn’t be out-hustled, he really meant he’d hustle everyone to win this race.

Look on Paulsen’s webpage – rather than talking about Iraq (or, for that matter, Afghanistan), Paulsen talks about money. This money includes cash raised at a strip-club in Vegas; money raised at a strip-club in Vegas that, by comparison, makes the money Paulsen took from a Cheney fundraiser look relatively clean.

Make no mistake, Ladies and Gentlemen – when it comes to money, Paulsen’s been taking a blind eye – just as he takes a blind eye with regards to Iraq. If you like George W. Bush and D*ck Cheney, you’ll love Erik “The Hustler” Paulsen.

(cross-posted from The Eden Prairie News)

(originally published at MnBlue.com)

Tagged with: