On February 25th, Toronto’s The Globe And Mail newspaper reported:

Canada’s broadcasting regulator has abandoned its attempt to change a regulation that prohibits the dissemination of false or misleading news.

In a nutshell, it’s illegal in Canada to go on the air tell lies. Period. End of story.

And I should point out, and will demonstrate below, that decision to continue the prohibition was specifically aimed at keeping Faux Noise OUT of Canada.

That said, here in the good ol’ USofA? No such prohibition, and just two days after Canada reaffirmed that they will not tolerate BS (that’s “B” as in “bull” and “S” as in “(stuff)”), Faux Noise demonstrated that while Canada has a high regard for facts and truth, Fox News does not.

Faux Noise “Fox News” has a Repeater “Reporter” on the scene in Madison, flinging bull(stuff) “filing reports” about the ongoing demonstrations against GOPer Governor Scott Walker’s attempt (aided and abetted by Wisconsin’s GOPER Legislators) to slash public employee’s wages, kill their unions, and sell off state assets to the lowest bidder and/or closest political cronies.

Posted above is a screen shot of two tweets by said Faux Noise’s Sock Puppet “Man” On The Scene, @MikeTobinFox.

There’s just one problem with what Sock Puppet “Man” On The Scene, @MikeTobinFox tweeted:

It’s not true.

In fact, it’s complete BS.

As Media Matters reports:

In an interview with Media Matters later Monday, Tobin sought to downplay the incident, which he continued to describe as a “punch.”

“It was a punch. A punch is a punch, but it was just a punch in my arm. I grew up with three older brothers, it’s not my first time being punched. I don’t want to overdramatize it for the sake of TV or anything like that.”

Then came the video.

On Tuesday morning, what appears to be footage of the alleged incident recorded by someone in the crowd was posted at LiveLeak.com.

Mediaite, which had trumpeted Tobin’s initial allegations, reported that the new video “certainly seems to counter the initial claim that Tobin had been hit.”

And Raw Story reported that “someone merely touched [Tobin's] shoulder, as evidenced in the video. … The incident he claimed was a ‘punch’ could instead be described as a pat, at most.”

After the video emerged, Media Matters once again contacted Tobin for comment. This time, he didn’t respond.

Instead, a Fox spokesperson called Media Matters and said that Tobin would have no further comment on the matter. (more, here)

Well, OF COURSE Tobin “would have no further comment” – he’d just been caught tellin’ a whopper. In other words, Tobin’s tweets – posted above – are lies.

Now, back to Canada, and why they don’t let Faux Noise broadcast their propaganda to Canadians. First, we’ll go to a public comment on the matter, by Professor Stephen Phillips from the Dept. of Political Science, Langara College in Vancouver:

Date reçu / Date Arrived: 2011-02-09

Numéro de processus public / Public Process Number: 2011-14
Numéro d’intervention / Intervention Number: 3166
Cas / Case: 146611

Demande à comparaître à l’audience publique / Request to appear at the public hearing: Non/No

Commentaire / Comment:
I oppose the proposed amendments to regulations governing the broadcasting of false or misleading news. The proposed qualification (viz, false or misleading news “which is likely to endanger the lives, health or safety of the public”) would have the effect of narrowing significantly the scope of the current restriction. I fail to see the rationale for making it easier for broadcasters to mislead the general public. News organizations have a duty to use the public airwaves in a responsible manner. The should not have carte blanche to deceive the public.

Like any right, free speech is not absolute. It must be balanced against other rights and vital interests. The parliamentary committee that recommended this review is evidently of the opinion that the current regulations may run afoul of Section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, largely based on past jurisprudence (the Zundel case in particular). Be that as it may, it would not be appropriate in my view to amend the current regulations merely because they “may” be found one day by the courts to violate the Charter. It is difficult at best to anticipate how the courts may rule in Charter cases. That is especially so given that the facts and circumstances of the Zundel case are materially different from those having to do with the regulation of Canada’s public airwaves. Notwithstanding their ruling in Zundel, the courts may well conclude that the public interest in accurate, reliable news coverage by licenced broadcasters trumps the rights of those who would flood the airwaves with false information.

In any case, were the courts to strike down the current regulations, it would be open to Parliament to sustain them by using the notwithstanding clause. Such a move would be an entirely legitimate exercise of Parliament’s constitutional authority. It would therefore be presumptious to loosen regulations that the courts might uphold or that parliamentarians may choose to reaffirm.

In conclusion, there is no compelling need to weaken the current restrictions on the broadcasting of false or misleading news. On the contrary, it would have undesirable consequences for Canadian democracy. The impunity with which disreputable news organizations like Fox News spread lies and invective in the United States should alert us to the dangers of removing the regulatory safeguards now in place in Canada.

Copie envoyée à la réquérante / Copy sent to applicant: Non/No

Let’s take a look again, at the professor’s last sentence:

The impunity with which disreputable news organizations like Fox News spread lies and invective in the United States should alert us to the dangers of removing the regulatory safeguards now in place in Canada. (emphasis added)

And there’s a whole bunch of comments, from concerned Canadian Citizens, saying essentially the same thing: “We do NOT want Faux Noise’s BS here in Canada.”

Now to be fair, there IS something Sock Puppet “Man” On The Scene, @MikeTobinFox reported that IS true; he said he was surrounded by protesters chanting “Fox Lies” and holding signs saying the same thing: “Fox Lies.”

But the protesters were only chanting “Fox Lies” and holding signs saying “Fox Lies” for the old-fashioned reason: it’s true.

Sock Puppet “Man” On The Scene, @MikeTobinFox reporting on-air, on Faux Noise, that he was “punched” is NOT true.

Faux Noise: We distort; You Abide.

In Canada, that’s illegal. Here in America, it’s not. (Thank you, Uncle Ronnie – NOT.)

Which, of course, helps explain the 2010 election results…

It’s like I always say: “Those that forget the lessons of history (and, watch Faux Noise) tend to vote GOP”

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject.com; comments welcome there)

Watching the GOP’s state convention on Saturday, I heard the name “Craig Westover” during some debate from the floor. “Craig Westover”? The “Craig Westover” that bloviates at the right-leaning Pioneer Press?

Yep! THAT Craig Westover; the Craig Westover that has the following at the bottom of his columns in the Pioneer Press:

Craig Westover is a contributing columnist to the Pioneer Press Opinion Page and a senior policy fellow at the Minnesota Free Market Institute (mnfmi.org).

Does anyone see anywhere in that “inComplete Disclosure” that Craig Westover is not only involved in republiCon party polics, he’s managed to make his way to the rarified air of the State Central Committee?

I don’t, and I remember that in 2006, Craig “Firmly Embeded” Westover was not only “contributing” at the PiPress, Craig Westover was part of the PiPress’ candidate endorsement screening process.

Hmmmm… I remember from back in the day, when I was a GOPer, how hard it was to get elected just from BPOU to District; I can’t imagine that these days it’s any easier to go from District to State (especially what with all that ideological purging for purity’s sake in the GreedOverPrinciples party) and I really can’t believe some newbie – say, since December 2006 – goes from bein’ NOT involved in party politics and goes all the way to State Central Committee participant.

Bottom line? I guessed Craig Westover was up to his neck in partisan party politics when the Pioneer Press had him involved in its endorsement process.

So, I asked the PiPress the pointed question:

How aware of Craig Westover’s party activism was the Pioneer Press back in 2006, when the Pioneer Press involved Craig Westover in its endorsement process?

Here’s the thoughtful and complete answer I got:

Tommy,

Aware enough.

ROFLMAO!!!!

The Pioneer Press was aware of Craig “Firmly Embedded” Westover’s partisan political activism, and let him participate in candidate endorsement anyway ??!?

No wonder “journalism” is held in such low esteem, these days.

I thought I’d give the PiPress another shot, so I sent in reply:

(redacted)you want to make an official, “for quote” statment before I start writing?

How about you, Craig?

Craig’s in there, because I started out asking Craig about his involvement in partisan party politics, and CC’d the PiPress. Mr. Firmly Embedded seemed to get a little nervous as my questions became more pointed, at which point I switched tacks and asked the pointed question, above, to the PiPress and cc’d Craig.

Here’s what I got back, from the PiPress, after asking if they wanted to give a “for quote” statment:

Tommy,

Nope. Write whatever you want. First Amendment’s a beautiful thing.

Apparently, the PiPress knows that “journalistic integrity” isn’t incorporated in the First Amendment – because it isn’t.

And neither is “inComplete Disclosure.”

Those of you reading this, that are involved in campaigns, may want to remember this sordid little story next year, during endorsement screening time.

The Pioneer Press is going to ask you to be open and honest.

Remember that they weren’t.

Oh, and For The Record – here’s Mr. Firmly Embedded’s response to the request for quote:

“For the record, Prior to the 2008 election cycle, I was a casual GOP caucus attendee. I got active in the 2008 cycle so I could go to the state convention as a Ron Paul delegate and really got active after the 2008 convention. I have not written anything for the PiPress promoting a partisan issue other than the principles I have always pushed.” — Craig Westover, 15 June 2009

Yeah, “right.” Go with that, Craig. I have no way to verify it, but: it sounds like Fishsticks to me.

Oh, speaking of Fishsticks: apparently, I wasn’t the only one that noticed Mr. Firmly Embedded’s party activism – Spot over at The Cucking Stool noticed, too. Spot takes a look at Mr. Firmly Embedded’s backing Michele Bachmann’s “Gangster Government” rantings, and – most appropriately – includes pictures of Tom DeLay and Jack Abramoff.

I’m guessing Craig “Firmly Embedded” Westover didn’t do much writing about Jack Abramoff, Tom DeLay, nor The K Street Project.

Come to think about it, the Pioneer Press didn’t publish much about those three, either.

Well, to the Pioneer Press and Craig “Firmly Embedded” Westover, I’m sure it was the “right” thing to do…..

(crossposted from MnProgressiveProject)