Mitch Berg is on a roll, today. Not a good one, but a roll, and typical to boot. First, Mitch rips Obama for Obama answering a question exactly the way he was asked to (see Another Example Of Why You Cannot Trust republiCons). As demonstrated, Mitch clearly had his facts wrong. So, how does Mitch follow up his factually incorrect smear of Obama?
By bein’ factually incorrect again. From Mitch’s latest miss it missive:
Ken [Weiner] recorded audio of Jason Lewis on KTLK talking with Chris and the MN CD6 GOP Chair Mark Swanson who are quite displeased with the “clear campaign to expel” Olson.
So listen and tell me – where does anyone mention Brodkorb? (Shot In The Dark)
Say, Mitch? At the 6:09 mark. CLEARLY at the 6:09 mark.
Now, prior to Mitch clearly “not paying attention (at best)”, Mitch states, this:
What does Mitch go on, to say, later?
First: “Seemingly coordinated?” Really, Aaron? Do tell. Do you know something we don’t? You have emails? Photos of people meeting at Keegans? Anything at all? Correlation does not equal causation. You either show the coordination – or at least why it should “seem” coordinated to us – or rewrite accordingly.
ROFLMAO!!!!
Mitch makes an accusation about Aaron, and then rips Aaron for the same thing!!! “Pot, meet kettle” is what some might call it; I call it another example of typical republiCon hypocrisy.
Let’s re-write what Mitch just wrote, shall we?
“Landry is, by all accounts, Al Franken’s full-time flak on the MNPublius staff.” Really, Mitch? Do tell. Do you know something we don’t? You have emails? Photos of people meeting over Brie And Chablis? Anything at all? Correlation does not equal causation. You either show the coordination – or at least why it should “seem” coordinated to us – or rewrite accordingly.
The title of Mitch’s rant is: “Being A Kept Blogger Means Never Having To Get Your Facts Straight”
Say, Mitch? It sure looks like you’re sure doin’ a heckofa job provin’ just that.
(originally published at MnBlue.com)
For some reason, Mitch Berg’s blog won’t let me sign in. And I can’t e-mail him, because he proudly boasts he’ll publicly post not only the e-mail address, but IP address, too – of anyone he sees fit any e-mail he considers “abusive”.
So, I’ll take up this example of republiCons makin’ stuff up here, on MnBlue.
Here’s the question, Rick Warren asked:
Now, that should be clear to reasonable and objective observers: Rick Warren asked “which ONE.” (CNN has it “singular”, too – but rightwingnuts don’t “trust” CNN, so I sourced it to Rick Warren first)
But even though Obama was clearly asked “which one”, reasonable people need to remember that rightwingnuts never let facts get in the way of an opportunity for a chance to jump into the gutter and go for a gratuitous smear. Here’s what Mitch Berg just posted, a little ago:
By Mitch Berg
Paul Mirengoff from Powerline’s takeaway from Mac and Barry’s go-round at Saddleback – in this case, on the candidates’ answers about their Supreme Court choices:
In any case, what’s most telling here is Obama’s unwillingness or inability to do what McCain did — identify the four (or five) Justices he obviously wouldn’t have nominated, and articulate the simple and obvious reason. Instead, Obama gave an incomplete answer coupled with an irrelevant reference to Thomas’ level of experience, a plug for his status as a “professor,” and (after prompting) a cheap shot at Roberts.(Powerline)
Read the whole thing for the context, obviously.
But this highlights how, via inexperience or (messianic) temperament, Obama’s just not ready for prime time in the “think on your feet” department. (Shot In The Dark)
Only in the rightwingnut world, is answering the question as asked (“which Supreme Court JUSTICE”) considered “inexperience or (messianic) temperament”, and worse.
Mitch Berg is simply demonstrating, to reasonable people, why reasonable people cannot trust republiCons to tell the truth — and is also demonstrating why GOP now stands for GreedOverPrinciples.
Reasonable people understand that when stuff has to be make up to make a point, the point isn’t worth making. Obama was asked a question; Obama answered the question as asked; but rightwingnuts make stuff up for some gratuitous cheap-shots that allegedly make a point.
Fortunately, the electorate has begun to realize that rightwingnuts make stuff up all the time, which is why the “Republican” brand has been completely trashed.
Some day, good and decent Republicans are going to reclaim their party’s leadership from the republiCons that have hijacked the once-Grand Old Party. Until then, reasonable people need to remain vigilant – as this tripe from Mitch Berg and Powerline so clearly demonstrates.
(originally published at MnBlue.com)
