Last Sunday, after reading noted GOPer apologist Jason Lewis’ latest rant in the Star Tribune, I posted “Who Is The Whiny 9 Year Old Here?” In it, I wrote: “I’d fact-check Jason, but what’s the point? It’s not like pointing out (once again) that Reagan said “facts are stupid things” and GOPers live it will really change their deceitful ways.”
Well, yesterday – over at MinnPost – Eric Black took a look at Lewis’ rant, too – in a post entitled “Jason Lewis’ wrong and exaggerated arguments about freedom”. And it’s well worth the read — so go read it! Here’s a teaser:
Everything the right likes can be phrased as a form of “freedom,” as in freedom of the rich from paying higher taxes, freedom of corporations from government regulation, freedom to pollute, freedom of those with almost unlimited resources to use those resources to influence elections, freedom of the wealthiest 1 percent to accumulate any damn portion of the society’s wealth and income without shame, freedom to overthrow foreign governments (but only in order to bring freedom to the oppressed of those nations) and a few other important freedoms that you can think of on your own.
(more, here)
One area Eric Black pokes a big hole in Lewis’ rant is the wingnut right’s fixation on “the Founders” and their alleged anti-tax views. Again, Reagan said “Facts are stupid things” and wingnuts like Lewis prove it on a regular basis. That’s why I stuck that picture of ol’ Ben Franklin and that quote up there – ripping “money manipulators”. OK, that quote was probably misattributed to ol’ Ben. Be that as it may, Ben was a wise man indeed and – IMNSHO – would be standing with today’s Occupy Wall Street protestors; protesting today’s dishonest monetary system.
Eric blows a hole in Lewis’ misuse of Federalist #21. I like the following quote from the second paragraph of Federalist #2:
“Nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of government, and it is equally undeniable, that whenever and however it is instituted, the people must cede to it some of their natural rights in order to vest it with requisite powers.” — Publius (John Jay), October 31st, 1787
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Only a fool would believe what GOPers say – and what their apologists, like Jason Lewis and Katherine Kersten, write.
Noted GOPer apologist Jason Lewis is simply an example of: “You Couldn’t Trust The GOP Then, You Still Can’t Now, And Tomorrow Won’t Be Any Different.”
(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject.com; comments welcome there)

If you were following my tweets yesterday (follow me on Twitter here), I posted a bunch of quotes concerning Iraq from Boy Blunder And The Plunderers.
To me, the lesson of 9-11 is what I always say:
Republicans run on the platform “Government doesn’t work!” – once in power, they prove it.
And the amazing thing is, GOPers co-opted the Teabaggers – and TeaBaggers aren’t smart enough to figure that out.
I went to a Teabagger Candidate Training last February; it was produced for Teabagger Wanna-Bees by AmericanMajority.org. None are as blind as those that refuse to see. As I look back at that terrible terrorist attack ten years ago, I see a Republican Party that turned a tragic event into something worse.
Below is what I wrote on September 11th, 2008 – and reposted on 9-11 last year. I said it before, I said it again, and I still stand by it.
****
From The Archives: “T-130 – It’s Hard”
by: TwoPuttTommy Sat Sep 11, 2010 at 08:58:48 AM CDT
(I said it before, and I stand by it now. This one is a post I made on September 11th, 2008 – and the T-130 was the countdown to The End Of An Error; the misAdministration of George orWell Bush. And BTW – where the (cheney) IS “Osama Been Forgotten”??!?)
“One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror.” — George orWell Bush, CBS News interview, September 6th, 2006
Looking back, I remember where I was 7 years ago, today, when I first saw the replay of the first plane hitting the tower.
And I watched the news about that attack, closely. For a long time. As in, “still.” But I didn’t hear about what Condoleeza Rice was scheduled to do, on this date 7 years ago, until April of 2004.
She was going to give a speech. Not about Osama Bin Laden; not about al Qaeda; not about Extremist Islamic Fundamentalism. No, Condoleeza Rice was going to talk about what this misAdministration felt was the most dangerous threat to America, long-range missiles, furthering the goals set out in 1997 by the neo-conservative goup, Project for the New American Century.
Fast forward to George orWell’s comment, on September 6th, 2006, above – “One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror.”
Ladies and Gentlemen, this misAdministration has never been focused on the real threat to America; this misAdministration used the ol’ “bait ‘n switch” ruse to do what the Neo-Con Right Wing always wanted: topple Saddam and radically transform America’s military. From Project for the New American Century’s 76 page “Rebuilding America’s Defenses:
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a
new Pearl Harbor.(page 51)
So, just who are the people that formed PNAC; the PNAC that thought that a “new Pearl Harbor” might speed up the transformation of the American Military in a way they thought beneficial? Let’s look:
Elliott Abrams, Gary Bauer, William J. Bennett, Jeb Bush,
Dick Cheney, Eliot A. Cohen, Midge Decter, Paula Dobriansky, Steve Forbes,
Aaron Friedberg, Francis Fukuyama, Frank Gaffney, Fred C. Ikle,
Donald Kagan, Zalmay Khalilzad, I. Lewis Libby, Norman Podhoretz,
Dan Quayle, Peter W. Rodman, Stephen P. Rosen, Henry S. Rowen,
Donald Rumsfeld, Vin Weber, George Weigel, Paul Wolfowitz
So, today, as we mourn those that fell as the towers fell; those that fell in the heroic struggle on United Airlines Flight 93 in Pennsylvania; those that fell on American Airlines Flight 77 that crashed into the Pentagon; those brave men and women that have fallen in Iraq, remember this:
“One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror.” — George orWell Bush, September 6th, 2006
Of course it’s hard; Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 but everything to do with furthering neo-conservative goals.
In 130 days it will be January 20th, 2009 – The End Of An Error
OK, I saw two things – first, an excellent YouTube over at the Cucking Stool, “And yet, they call it slander”; the second, a Tweet from Mitch Berg:

Both of ‘em have one thing in common: Mitch Berg, whom I wrote about (well, more than once) back in Sept. o’ ’09 in a post entitled “Mitch Berg – The Poster Boy Of Why Reasonable People Cannot Reasonably Believe republiCons”.
In that post, I awarded a
“Slimed by the MOB” (see right) to MnPP Contibutor BearBud, for – and I quote:
Since there are laws concerning public nudity, it’s safe to assume MNBearBud doesn’t run around “bare butt” – that Bootlicker Berg, once again, is simply making (stuff) up. What is fact is there is plenty more that clearly demonstrates Mitch Berg is completely unreasonable; has a history making stuff up; has and will continue to keep taking the cheap shots. IOW, that Berg is a complete (@rse)hole; he can’t help it – it’s simply who and what he is. And for his latest rant directed at MNBearBud, MNBearBud is hereby awared a badge of honor: “Slimed By The M.O.B.
I digress. In the latter tweet, Bootlicker Berg talks about a screenshot; we’ll talk about them.. In the first thing I saw, Spot’s Excellent Video shows TeaBaggers wearing, well, “tea bags.” And Bootlicker Berg has found referring to people that wear Tea Bags as “Tea Baggers” offensive. Like, say, Mitch does in the following tweet:

Say, Mitch? If ya didn’t wear Tea Bags, you wouldn’t be called “Tea Baggers.” Mitch, bein’ a bootlickin’ republiCon, doesn’t think his type should be held personally responsible for the things they personally did.
Which brings us back to the latter. Up there in Mitch’s Tweet, he talks about holding some guy responsible, via a “screenshot.” Well, Mitch can be held “responsible” via a “screenshot” too – let’s look!

Got that? “…balance checkbook…”?
Here’s another one, from Berg:

Got that? “…and I’ve raised income every year since 1993.”
See, Mitch is one o’ those ” gov’t can’t spend more money than it’s got!” kinda republiCons…. you know, like a “family does” (or, doesn’t)….
…and the proof is down at the ol’ Court House.
You see, on March 15th, 2004, Mitch was supposed to appear at the Court House, to answer a Summons And Complaint that he bounced a few checks (5, this time, to be exact) to a local small business around the corner from where he lives. Here’s the exact Plaintiff’s Statement Of Claim:
“The Defendant (Mitch Berg) owes me $216.48, plus filing fees and costs because he wrote out 5 checks to our small business. We allowed Mr. Berg to write checks to our establishment, even though he had bounced checks previously becuase he had made good on his debts. But to no avail has he responded to these last 5 checks. We called him and hand delivered letters of request for payment.”
Berg, of course, never showed up. The Small Business that Berg stiffed, in early 2004, received a Decision Of Judgement for Berg’s bounced checks.
So, when did Berg finally pay off his just debts (i.e., bounced checks, circa 2004), even though (in his words) Berg has had “raised income every year since 1993″?
The document states: “Satisfaction Filed – 25 Feb 2008.”
About FOUR YEARS later.
Not “bad” for a guy that, in his words, has had “raised income every year since 1993″?
So if and when Mitch Berg gets up on a TeaBagger stage this weekend and starts pontificating about how “Gov’t has to live within its means, like a family does!” – you’ll know what a complete fraud Mitch Berg is – as well as those “Get Your Gov’t Hands Off My Medicare!” Tea Baggers are, that allowed Bounced Checks Berg to get in front of their microphone.

(cross posted at MnProgressiveProject.com; comments welcome there)
In today’s print edition of the Strib, former Eden Prairie school board member and current Eden Prairie math teacher AND parent of an Eden Prairie student Ann Haines has an Op/Ed: 



Yesterday, I ran a post entitled 













